All posts
Thomson Reserve: a series

Published 13 October 2026

Did launch buyers near Thomson Reserve make money? How much, how fast, and did the launch price matter?

By Realila · Sales counted to 11 Oct 2026

Since 2000, 13 condos have launched within 2.5 km of Thomson Reserve. This note looks at the 11 whose launch premium could be measured. Rafflesia Condominium had too few nearby resales to measure it, and The Panorama had no nearby condo completed in the 15 years before its launch. We found every buyer who bought a unit from the developer and has since sold it: 2,070 sales in all. For each one, we compared the price they sold at with the price they paid.

Typical in this note means the median: the middle seller at a launch, with half doing better and half doing worse.

What is in this note

  • The short answer: whether buyers made money, how much, how fast, and whether the launch price mattered
  • Launch by launch: each launch's typical gain, yearly rise and years held, in one table
  • Did the launch price matter?: each launch's premium over nearby resale against how its buyers did compared with the market

The short answer

  • Did they make money? Most did. At every one of the 11 launches, at least 78% of sellers sold for more than they paid.
  • How much? The typical seller's gain ranged from $170,900 at Thomson Grand to $581,464 at Clover by the Park. That is 10.9% to 49.4% of what they paid.
  • How fast? The typical yearly rise ranged from 1.34% at Thomson Grand to 7.56% at Clover by the Park. At 7 of the 11 launches, buyers' prices moved within 1 percentage point a year of the private home market. The year they bought made more difference to their result than which condo they bought.
  • Did the launch price matter? Of the 6 launches priced more than a third above nearby resale, 5 rose more slowly than the market afterwards. Of the 5 priced lower, 4 rose faster.

Launch by launch

Sorted by launch year. Gain is the sale price minus the purchase price. Per year is the same rise spread evenly over the years held, compounded, like an interest rate.

LaunchSalesTypical gain% gainPer yearYears held
The Gardens at Bishan2000443$229,20040.5%4.98%6.9
Bishan Point2002111$210,00036.8%4.66%6.7
Clover by the Park2008258$581,46449.4%7.56%4.8
Centro Residences2009129$180,93016.0%1.64%8.3
Thomson Grand2011165$170,90010.9%1.34%9.4
Sky Habitat2012114$199,29014.0%1.58%8.6
Sky Vue2013221$234,50021.6%3.00%7.3
Thomson Three2013160$260,00022.9%2.70%8.2
Thomson Impressions2015102$190,20020.1%2.96%6.6
Jadescape2018326$370,25027.2%5.35%4.6
AMO Residence202241$467,00020.9%5.48%3.7

A bigger dollar gain doesn't always mean a faster rise. Thomson Three's typical seller gained $260,000 at 2.70% a year, over 8.2 years. Bishan Point's gained less, $210,000, but at 4.66% a year, over 6.7 years. Results also varied within a launch. At Clover by the Park, the middle half of sellers gained between 5.26% and 13.95% a year. The Method lists that spread for every launch.

Did the launch price matter?

A launch's premium is how far its launch price was above what nearby homes resold for at the time: its typical new-sale psf in its launch year against the typical resale psf that year at completed condos within 1.2 km.

To see whether a premium held buyers back, we compared each buyer's yearly rise with the market's over the same dates. For the market we used URA's price index for private non-landed homes. The result is in percentage points a year. For example, Jadescape buyers' prices rose a typical 5.35% a year, which was 0.8 percentage points a year less than the market over the same dates.

Two launches a year apart

Sky Habitat and Sky Vue, both in Bishan, launched in 2012 and 2013. Sky Habitat was priced much further above nearby resale.

Sky Habitat, 2012Sky Vue, 2013
Priced above resale45%29%
Typical rise a year1.58%3.00%
Against the market−0.7 pts+1.1 pts

Sky Vue's buyers paid a smaller premium. Afterwards, their homes rose faster than the market, and Sky Habitat's rose more slowly.

All 11 launches

a third above resale0255075−2024Premium over resale (%)Against the market (points per year)1, Centro Residences: Premium over resale (%) 73%, Against the market (points per year) −0.8 pts2, Thomson Grand: Premium over resale (%) 47%, Against the market (points per year) −0.2 pts3, The Gardens at Bishan: Premium over resale (%) 47%, Against the market (points per year) +0.4 pts4, Sky Habitat: Premium over resale (%) 45%, Against the market (points per year) −0.7 pts5, Jadescape: Premium over resale (%) 38%, Against the market (points per year) −0.8 pts6, Thomson Impressions: Premium over resale (%) 38%, Against the market (points per year) −0.8 pts7, Sky Vue: Premium over resale (%) 29%, Against the market (points per year) +1.1 pts8, Thomson Three: Premium over resale (%) 27%, Against the market (points per year) +1.1 pts9, AMO Residence: Premium over resale (%) 23%, Against the market (points per year) +1.3 pts10, Bishan Point: Premium over resale (%) 18%, Against the market (points per year) −0.5 pts11, Clover by the Park: Premium over resale (%) −4%, Against the market (points per year) +4.1 pts1234567891011
  1. Centro Residences
  2. Thomson Grand
  3. The Gardens at Bishan
  4. Sky Habitat
  5. Jadescape
  6. Thomson Impressions
  7. Sky Vue
  8. Thomson Three
  9. AMO Residence
  10. Bishan Point
  11. Clover by the Park
Each dot is one launch. Further right means priced further above nearby resale. Above the zero line, buyers' homes rose faster than the market; below it, more slowly. The dashed line marks a third above resale. Hollow dots are the two launches compared with only one nearby condo.
LaunchPriced above nearby resaleAgainst the market, a year
Centro Residencesone comparison73%−0.8 pts
Thomson Grand47%−0.2 pts
The Gardens at Bishan47%+0.4 pts
Sky Habitat45%−0.7 pts
Jadescape38%−0.8 pts
Thomson Impressions38%−0.8 pts
Sky Vue29%+1.1 pts
Thomson Three27%+1.1 pts
AMO Residence23%+1.3 pts
Bishan Pointone comparison18%−0.5 pts
Clover by the Park−4% (below)+4.1 pts

Of the six launches priced more than a third above resale, five rose more slowly than the market. Of the five launches priced lower, four rose faster. Clover by the Park, the only launch priced below nearby resale, beat the market by the most. Centro Residences and Bishan Point could each be compared with only one nearby condo, so their premiums are less certain. Leaving them out gives the same pattern.

With only 11 launches, this pattern cannot be treated as a rule. As a check, we repeated the comparison with Realila's own price index. It gave the same answer, faster or slower than the market, for 7 of the 9 launches it covers.

More on this: how the premium is measured, and how Thomson Reserve's compares

What about costs?

All these figures are before stamp duty, fees and loan interest. A sale has to cover those costs before the seller makes money.

More on this: how much prices would need to rise to cover those costs at Thomson Reserve

What this tells you

Near Thomson Reserve, most launch buyers who sold made money, at every launch since 2000. How fast their homes rose depended mostly on the market in the years they held. The launch premium made a smaller difference: buyers who paid a bigger premium over nearby resale tended to do somewhat worse than the market, and those who paid less tended to do somewhat better.

What this does not tell you

  • What buyers actually earned. The figures compare sale price with purchase price, before stamp duty, fees and loan interest. Launch buyers also pay in stages while the condo is built, so their return on the cash they put in differs from the price change. We'll publish that comparison, matched against resale buyers, after Thomson Reserve launches.
  • How owners who haven't sold are doing. Only completed sales are counted. At Jadescape, 326 have sold, and the rest still own their units.
  • Anything about Thomson Reserve's future prices. These are past results, not a forecast.
Method and data notes

Data. URA caveat records of private home sales held by Realila: condominiums and apartments, single-unit sales only, collective sales excluded, sales to 11 October 2026.

Launches. The 11 launches within 2.5 km of Thomson Reserve since 2000 whose launch premium could be measured, landed homes and executive condominiums excluded. A launch needs at least 5 completed sales.

First owners. A first owner bought a unit from the developer and later sold it. Their sale is the next recorded sale of the same unit, whether before completion (a sub-sale) or after. A unit the developer sold twice isn't counted, and owners still holding aren't counted.

Gain and yearly rise. A gain is the sale price minus the purchase price, before stamp duty, fees and loan interest. The yearly rise is the sale price over the purchase price, to the power of 1 over the years held, minus 1. Years held are the days between the two contract dates divided by 365.25. Holds under a year count in the number of sales and the share sold at a profit, but not in the yearly figures. The middle half of sellers is the 25th to 75th percentile:

LaunchTypical rise a yearMiddle half of sellers
The Gardens at Bishan4.98%3.25–5.96%
Bishan Point4.66%2.10–5.53%
Clover by the Park7.56%5.26–13.95%
Centro Residences1.64%0.28–2.93%
Thomson Grand1.34%0.19–2.28%
Sky Habitat1.58%0.25–2.55%
Sky Vue3.00%2.16–3.70%
Thomson Three2.70%2.05–3.51%
Thomson Impressions2.96%1.86–4.05%
Jadescape5.35%4.33–6.51%
AMO Residence5.48%4.73–6.22%

Against the market. URA's price index for private non-landed homes is quarterly. We read it at the quarter of each purchase and each sale. A buyer's figure is their yearly rise minus the index's over the same dates, in percentage points. The table shows each launch's median. Sales after the index's latest quarter, 2026 Q2, are left out of this comparison. Realila's own repeat-sales index, which starts in 2009, is used only as a check.

Priced above resale. Each launch's premium is its median new-sale psf in its launch year over the median resale psf, that year, at condominiums within 1.2 km of it that were completed in the 15 years before and had at least 5 resales that year. A launch year is the first year with at least 20 new sales. Bishan Point and Centro Residences were each compared against only one such condo, so their premiums are less certain; they show as hollow dots on the chart.

Corrections

21 October 2026. This note said "Since 2000, 11 condos have launched within 2.5 km of Thomson Reserve." That count left out the condos whose launch premium could not be measured. It now says "Since 2000, 13 condos have launched within 2.5 km of Thomson Reserve. This note looks at the 11 whose launch premium could be measured."

21 October 2026. This note said "A bigger dollar gain doesn't always mean a faster rise" and gave Thomson Grand and Jadescape as the example, but in this note's table Jadescape had both the bigger dollar gain and the faster rise. It now gives "Thomson Three's typical seller gained $260,000 at 2.70% a year, over 8.2 years. Bishan Point's gained less, $210,000, but at 4.66% a year, over 6.7 years."

More from Realila

Every number in this post comes from Realila Research, dated to when it was true. For now we publish research notes from the platform to answer the community's questions; the platform itself opens to the public later. Realila is not marketing or selling Thomson Reserve and is not paid by its developers. To buy a unit, speak to an agent of your choice.

Join the waitlist

Leave your email and we will tell you when the research platform opens.

See all posts on the Realila Feed

Ask for a research note

A question about the market, or data you would like to see.

We read every request. We cannot write a note on every one, but the ones we do write will appear on the Feed, and we will email you if yours does.